Note: This is the text for a talk I gave to Olivet's graduating
teacher candidates last April. The audience consisted of seniors who had just
finished student teaching, and were poised to enter the field. I used the space
to reflect on the changing and unchanging aspects of teaching, and gave some
advice to our graduates on how to hold steady amidst what can feel like a
tumultuous world of education. At the end, everyone got a trowel.
I’d
like to thank the ONU School of Education for the opportunity to address you
student teachers as you leave the period of teacher preparation, and enter the
field of teaching. And field is an appropriate word here, because the point of
my talk tonight is to invite you to consider teaching as farming, or gardening.
As
you well know, the theme of the Olivet Nazarene University teacher education
framework is “Professionals Influencing Lives.” One of your teacher-candidate
colleagues recently asked me whether I thought this phrase was one of those
nice-sounding sayings that is more form than substance. Whether “professionals
influencing lives” really means something. And this student spoke with all the
confidence of a Junior, which he is. He said that "influence" can be
positive or negative. He said that "professionals" might refer to
anyone who gets paid for their work. So really–this student said–“Professionals
Influencing Lives” could mean “Paid workers doing work that affects those
around them either positively or negatively.” The student’s point called into
question our theme, the backbone of who we are. I mean it’s literally the
writing on the on the wall outside our offices! In one sense, this student
is right. It’s always important to define your terms. And while I know your professors
who taught you as freshmen were clear about what we mean by “professionals” and
“influence,” I want to take one more stab at the phrase before you leave us.
What do we mean by professionals? What do we mean by influence?
If
we were to poll 100 veteran teachers, I am willing to wager that all 100 would
tell you that teaching has changed drastically in the last 20 years. The
changes in educational technology are nearly impossible to keep up with, data
analysis is a new job demand for teachers and school leaders, increased
competition has entered the educational marketplace, reliance on experts and
evidence has supplanted teacher instincts, and high stakes evaluations have
moved “teacher accountability” from a political talking point to a reality for
teachers. So here we are, at a time of change for teachers. And many
school reformers are pushing to apply concepts birthed in the business world to
fix our schools. You can hear reverberations of business-talk from each of the
trends I mentioned: increased technology; increased data analysis; greater
competition; reliance on experts and scientific evidence for our teaching
practice, and high-stakes accountability.
This cross-roads—this time of
change—reminds me of the crossroads faced by our nation’s farmers in the years
following World War II. My own grandpfather was one of those farmers. He grew
up before the war, and before the war, he farmed in the “old way,” with a
humble, 80-acre plot in Central Illinois, in close proximity with his dad and
his brother, and with his animals. Grandpa Stipp never went to college, but he
was known as a bright man and as a prankster. After the war, Grandpa came home
and married my grandma, and they began farming in the new way that is quite
nearly the only way professional farming is done today. Teams of work horses
were replaced by tractors. Days of camaraderie with father and brother were
replaced by days of solitude. Small farms were replaced by big ones. And the
list of changes goes on.
I want you to listen the
characteristics of this new way of farming: it had an increased use of
technology, it involved greater data analysis, it required trust in
agricultural experts. And famers of whatever scale needed large-scale
machinery, debt became a way of life, and became a way that high-stakes
accountability entered the sphere of agriculture. Do these changes sound
familiar? Increased use of technology, increased data analysis, more rigorous
competition, increased reliance on experts and research, and high-stakes
accountability.
In addition to farming, grandpa Stipp also enjoyed collecting
antique tools, guns, and knives. Part of his draw to these old tools was the
opportunity to remember. He told stories of how old tools were used, and in so
doing provided windows into how life had been. Shortly before Grandpa Stipp
died back in 2013, I asked him about the horses he worked with in his fields.
As he described them, he began to cry. Even though he embraced new farming
methods as much as anyone, It was clear that grandpa also missed
something, and felt something about deeply about the old way of farming. The
working life of my grandpa’s boyhood was barely recognizable from the farming
work he did from 1945 up until 2013.
Well since I’ve been a professor here at Olivet, I’ve gotten to
take a step back from classroom teaching, and do some watching. When I go to
our schools, either to observe teacher candidates, or even to attend my own
kids’ parent-teacher conferences, I observe two categories of
teachers. First, there is the type that acquiesces to the changes in the
field without a vision. These teachers adopt any new technology or teaching
tool, with the wrong assumption that the “new” will provide shortcuts that make
the teaching profession easy. These teachers are frustrated with the
uncontrollable nature of students and building administrators, and find that
the "new" ways provides more pressure than relief. Threats of losing
their job are felt daily, and cause them to question their pedagogies. Often,
it is these teachers who encourage young people, “don’t go into education.” And
if teaching were merely the frustrating dead-end that these women and men
experience, they would be offering good advice.
But there is another category of teacher I observe, too. These are
the teachers who take the long view. These are the teachers who find the joy in
instructing, in their students’ humor and wonder, in the “light bulb moments,”
and even in the challenges of teaching. These are the teachers who recognize
the ancient nature of teaching. Who would share a fraternity with previous
generations of teachers from one room schoolhouses, Mann's common schools or
Dewey's progressive schools. I think of these teachers as gardeners. They are not
relinquishing the joys of teaching because the educational trends provide new
challenges. This is the type of professional influencing lives we want for you
to become. If these teachers are gardeners, then their classroom is their
garden plot, and the students are their plants.
Good gardeners are concerned with the long-term health of their
plants. Your job is to remove weeds and to water your plants, but to do so with
care. Not for short term yields (like standardized test scores) but for
long-term health markers like curiosity, neighborliness, mutual enjoyment, and
delight. You are concerned with the health of your plants. So don’t teach your
students strategies for comprehending isolated paragraphs. Teach them to loves
stories; teach them to get lost in novels. Don’t teach your students techniques
for cramming their short-term memory for test success. Teach them to care
deeply about your content.
Good gardeners use all their senses to adapt to
their garden’s needs. Good teachers do the same. Good gardeners are
collaborators. Good gardeners are hungry for ideas that can improve their
garden, and love to share their ideas with others.
Good gardeners are primarily interested in their own plot; but
always recognize that the context of this plot is important. A garden of
diverse vegetation is easier to grow in Illinois’ rich topsoil than in rocky
Wyoming. In the same way, a classroom “plot” is dependent largely upon its
context, too. The broader context of a classroom—the history, sociology,
economics, and culture that exist in a school or in a neighborhood—are critical
for full understanding of the garden plot.Gardener-teachers are students of
their context. Over the course of their careers, gardener-teachers arrive at
conclusions, subsequently challenge their conclusions, and are careful to
listen to natives of a given context. I hope that you are finishing your
liberal arts degrees with a humble understanding of how little you understand.
Too much confidence can hurt your ability to understand. In the words of
Frederick Buechner, "it is no so much their subjects that the great
teachers teach as it is themselves."
Good gardeners have a vision for their plot that is not dependent
upon anyone else’s approval or opinion. Remember the teaching philosophies that
you wrote as freshmen, and revised and reworked over the years? These
philosophies were just the start of your philosophy that will evolve over the
years. Like good gardeners, good teachers are independent thinkers who know
their ideal, their philosophy, regardless of what their
administrators tell them.
Good
gardeners use a combination of science, experience, and intuition as they plan,
tend, weed, and harvest. Good teachers use a similar combination of
research-backed practices, experience, and intuition as you plan, teach, and
assess. Good gardeners are grateful for the gift of the good earth and for
its bounty. In the same way, good teachers recognize that they building upon
prevenient graces. Think of all the things teachers must together to make a
classroom work:
-
Students’ intellect and curiosity.
-
The books they use, all of which are authored by those who have gone
before them
-
The symmetry and internal logic mathematics
-
The natural world
-
History, fascinating, terrifying, and compelling
All of these are gifts for which a teacher should give praise, and
none of them are created by the teacher. It is the teachers job to weave these
gifts together, to make the content understandable, to make it pop, and to make
it stick. Teaching is difficult to do well, but a work of true beauty when all
the moving pieces align.
So
what kind of professional do we want you to be as you go out into the field of
education? What kind of influence do we want you to have in the face of the
changing nature of education? We want you to teach as one who recognizes the
dignity within each of your students. We want you to water your garden plots
with careful attention, and with prayer. We want you to nurture your students
into health and growth. We want you to survive the changing conditions that
threaten the vitality of education as a profession. We want you to enter into
your plots each day ready to endure what there is to be endured, and enjoy
what’s there to enjoy, day in and day out. Like a gardener.